Rodman v Rodman, SJC-11726 (Jan. 30, 2015)

March 4, 2015 by  
Filed under New Cases

2008 divorce with merged alimony judgment predated the Alimony Reform Act. Ex-husband sought to terminate alimony as he had reached full retirement age as defined by M.G.L. ch. 208, section 48. Ex-husband argued that modification based on full retirement allowable in merged divorce judgment because a merged judgment is “prospective” in effect. Court held that section 49(f) is inapplicable, and does not apply retroactively to both merged and surviving pre-Act separation agreements

Print Friendly
Share

Comments